Thursday, April 14, 2011
Body of evidence
So this is my second week of reading body of evidence, wand this time I'm actually ahead in the book. The characters in the book are moving on with the case and coming across some obstacles. This book is getting interesting to me and I can actaully learn fromthis since I want to be a csi. I'm noticing how patient an exact you have to be with your work. This book shows how every single detail of a case affects it somehow. If they don't keep in touch with each and fill each other in there will go nowhere. They have to work together to accomplish what they want.this book also showed me how important it is to know how human beige react to certain things and the actions that they make. If cops couldn't determine that they could never figure the killer. But I we all acted the same way cops wouldn't be able to rely on that information either. Simple things like that have a great impact on you being a suspect or not. This book shows the process of how long cases are. Not everyone is suitable for this job. The characters in the book are very hard ore people and they may come across as mean. But that is part of doing there job. They have to intimidate the suspects in order to get them to say what they want to hear. Alot of people these days don't really like cops because of how they act. But they can't take chances with anyone and people don't understand that. They are justdoing there job. I personally don't blame for the way that thy come across to people. I do admit that hey takeadvantage of heir powers and go alittle bit overboard but they may or may not have a criminal I. Front of them.
Thursday, April 7, 2011
body of evidence
I just started reading the book 'Body Of Evidence' yesterday. I haven't really gotten that far into the book so I can't do much deep thinking. So far in the book there a woman named Beryl Madison. This woman has been murdered. She has been getting stalked and receiving weird phone calls since last year. There is a group of agents who try to find the murderer using forensic science. They are forced to ask themselves some hard questions to try to put the pieces to the puzzle together.
They have to come up with there answers themselves. The way that they make it seem, its considered unethical to use information from other agencies and companies. In the book Kay Scarpetta, the agent whose trying to find the murderer, receives possible good information from a suspect. But that information is from another agency. Its good information but wouldn't it be considered "dirty" information since its from the enemy. You should take that information and use it to the best of your ability. Its not every time you can get good information like that. When it depends on finding a murderer or saving the life of someone your gonna have to change the rules a little bit when it comes to sharing information. Technically it would be considered wrong, but it is for a good cause.
They have to come up with there answers themselves. The way that they make it seem, its considered unethical to use information from other agencies and companies. In the book Kay Scarpetta, the agent whose trying to find the murderer, receives possible good information from a suspect. But that information is from another agency. Its good information but wouldn't it be considered "dirty" information since its from the enemy. You should take that information and use it to the best of your ability. Its not every time you can get good information like that. When it depends on finding a murderer or saving the life of someone your gonna have to change the rules a little bit when it comes to sharing information. Technically it would be considered wrong, but it is for a good cause.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)